DAR ES SALAAM: MOST businesses in Tanzania are sitting on valuable data. Sales records. Customer transactions. Loan books. Inventory logs. Website traffic. Mobile usage. Yet many decisions are still made the old way. By instinct. By habit. By copying competitors. That gap is costing money.
Across sectors, data has quietly shifted from being a reporting tool to a profit tool. Companies that understand this are growing margins, cutting waste and moving faster than the rest. Those that do not are guessing. And guessing is expensive. The difference is not technology. It is how data is used.
In banking, retail, telecoms and logistics, the same pattern appears. Dashboards exist. Reports are produced. Monthly numbers are circulated. But very few firms ask the right questions of the data.
They ask, “What happened last month?” They should be asking, “What will happen if we do nothing?” That single shift separates reporting from profit. Consider pricing.
Many firms still set prices once a year. Others adjust only when costs rise. Data-driven firms adjust prices based on demand patterns, seasonality, customer segments and elasticity. They know which customers absorb price changes and which disappear.
The result is higher revenue without higher volume. Most firms do not do this. Not because it is impossible. But because they do not look. Or take marketing. Large sums are spent on promotions, billboards, social media and sponsorships. Few companies can clearly show which campaigns actually convert into sales. Fewer still can show customer lifetime value by segment.
When budgets tighten, marketing is cut blindly. Profitable channels die with unprofitable ones. That is not cost control. That is guesswork. The same problem appears in operations. Inventory decisions are often based on rough forecasts or last year’s numbers. Stockouts happen while slowmoving goods pile up.
Warehouses expand. Cash gets trapped. Data could show reorder points, demand volatility and regional differences. Instead, managers rely on experience alone. Experience matters. But experience without data is risky. Even at the board level, data is underused.
Performance discussions focus on revenue growth and expense control. Rarely do they focus on unit economics, customer profitability, or early warning signals. By the time problems appear in financial statements, the damage is already done. This is where firms lose time. And time is money. Globally, the firms pulling ahead are not those with the most data scientists.
They are those where decision-makers understand how to turn data into action. They connect numbers to money. They ask uncomfortable questions. They measure what matters, not what is easy. In Tanzania, adoption is uneven.
Large firms invest in business intelligence tools but stop at visualisation. SMEs believe data is for big companies. Both assumptions are wrong. Data does not create value on its own. Decisions do. A dashboard that is not used in meetings is decoration. A report that does not change behaviour is noise.
The most profitable use of data often starts small. Tracking customer churn by reason. Measuring delivery delays by route. Linking credit approvals to default patterns. Comparing branch performance using the same rules.
These are not complex models. They are disciplined questions. What matters is consistency. When leaders demand databacked answers, teams adapt. When promotions depend on measurable impact, behaviour changes. When strategy discussions include numbers, opinions soften.
This is also where many firms fail. They buy tools but do not change culture. Data becomes the responsibility of analysts, not managers. When numbers challenge assumptions, they are ignored. Over time, analysts stop pushing. The organisation learns to look away.
ALSO READ: 50th DITF goes digital, expands jobs for Tanzanians
That is a leadership problem, not a technical one. There is also a cost to delay. Firms that rely on intuition struggle when markets shift. Inflation, interest rate changes and consumer pressure expose weak decision systems.
Those with data adjust faster. They cut losses early. They reallocate capital with confidence. Guessing works when margins are wide. They are not anymore.
Another overlooked issue is skills. Many firms collect data but lack people who can translate it into business language. Analysts speak charts. Executives speak money. When the two do not connect, insight dies in presentation slides. Firms that invest in translation, not just tools, see results faster.
The future belongs to firms that treat data as a core asset. Not as an IT project. Not as a compliance task. But as a daily management tool. One that answers simple questions clearly. Where do we make money? Where do we lose it? What should we stop doing?
Companies that answer these questions grow quietly. Others explain poor results loudly. Data is already a profit tool. The only remaining question is whether firms choose to use it, or continue guessing while competitors move ahead.